AITA for not giving my son a vehicle after I said I would
Image credit: Pixabay (This is example image – Not the actual photo)
A Son’s Entitlement or Parental Generosity?
When a mother offers to help her nearly 19-year-old son with a new vehicle, she expects gratitude, not complaints. After presenting him with two options—a low-mileage vehicle or a free Ford Edge with new tires—he expresses dissatisfaction, feeling he deserves more. This relatable dilemma raises questions about entitlement, expectations, and the balance of parental support versus personal responsibility. As tensions rise, the family must decide whether to continue their offer or let him face the consequences of his choices.
Family Drama Over Vehicle Offer: A Conflict Resolution Dilemma
A mother faces a challenging situation regarding her son’s vehicle needs, leading to family drama and tension. Here’s a breakdown of the events:
- Background: The mother’s son, soon to be 19, has been driving an old Silverado that is in poor condition. The vehicle was given to him when he received his driver’s license.
- Current Situation: The Silverado recently broke down, with the heater failing, which is problematic given their cold, snowy environment.
- Financial Assistance: After receiving some extra money from work, the mother offered to help her son with a vehicle, proposing a couple of thousand dollars if he could pay it back later.
- Alternative Offer: A friend of the family offered to sell a low-mileage vehicle for significantly less than its blue book value. However, the son’s job had recently cut back his hours, making it difficult for him to make payments.
- Parental Decision: The parents discussed the situation and decided it was important for their son to have a reliable vehicle. They presented him with two options:
- Purchase the new vehicle from the friend, allowing him to pay it off over time.
- Take their Ford Edge for free, with new tires provided to ensure it was ready for use.
- Son’s Reaction: The son expressed dissatisfaction with both options, feeling he was receiving “hand-me-downs.” He wanted to choose a different car that was more expensive and had higher mileage.
- Additional Complaints: He also complained about needing to arrange a day to get new tires for the Edge, perceiving it as an obligation rather than a benefit.
- Parental Frustration: The ongoing complaints led the parents to reconsider their offer. They contemplated revoking the vehicle offer and giving it to his sister, who would appreciate it more.
The mother is now questioning whether she would be in the wrong for withdrawing her offer to help her son with a vehicle due to his constant complaints. This situation highlights the complexities of family dynamics, expectations, and the challenges of conflict resolution in a time of wedding tension and familial obligations.
This is Original story from Reddit
Image credit: Pixabay (This is example image – Not the actual photo)
Story
My soon-to-be 19-year-old son has been driving a Silverado to work that is falling apart. It was a vehicle we had and just gave him when he got a license. He did put some money into it, but it is clearly not worth putting more in.
It recently had the heater go, which is a big deal as we live in a cold area with lots of snow. I recently got a little money from work and had told him that I would help some with a vehicle. I didn’t have much, but I could do a couple thousand if he could pay it back as it was set aside for a different bill.
After this, a friend offered to sell us a vehicle for well under blue book value and low mileage. My son’s job really cut back at this time, making it difficult for him to make payments. My husband, his dad, and I talked it over and decided it was still important for him to get a vehicle, so we tried to figure it out.
We approached him with an offer that we would buy this vehicle the friend offered, and he could either take the new vehicle, paying that price just over time as he made money, or take our Ford Edge, paying nothing, and we would put new tires on the Edge for him so it was ready to go. Both are in good shape with decent mileage. We figured with his job situation, giving him the option to pay us back for a low mileage vehicle or take a vehicle for free would be acceptable, but we were wrong.
He has complained nonstop about how he gets hand-me-downs. He wanted a car he picked out, but it had over double the mileage and cost more. He complained as well when we told him that he would need to set up a day to take in the Edge to get new tires.
He feels he is being forced to do a chore for us when we are literally paying to place new tires on a vehicle he is getting. It has got to the point that both his dad and I want to just revoke our offer and tell him to figure it out on his own, giving the vehicle to his sister who actually would appreciate it. Would I be the a-hole for not giving my son a vehicle after I said I would because he has complained the whole time about it?
View the Original Reddit Post Here
Summary of Reddit Comments
The top Reddit comments indicate a strong consensus that the individual in question is not at fault (NTA) for their decision regarding the car offer. Users emphasize that the young adult’s ungratefulness and refusal to appreciate the options presented to him justify the decision to withdraw the offer. Many commenters suggest that clear communication about his behavior and expectations is essential, and they support the idea of giving the car to his sister instead.
Overall Verdict: NTA
Expert Advice for Resolving the Vehicle Conflict
Family conflicts, especially those involving financial assistance and expectations, can be challenging to navigate. Here are some practical steps to help both the mother and son address the situation constructively:
- Open Communication: The mother should initiate a calm and open conversation with her son. It’s important to express her feelings about his reactions without placing blame. For example, she could say, “I feel hurt when I see you unhappy with the options I’ve provided, especially since I want to help you.” This approach encourages dialogue rather than defensiveness.
- Set Clear Expectations: The mother should clarify the reasons behind her offers. She can explain the financial constraints and the intention behind providing reliable transportation. This transparency can help the son understand the context of the offers and the sacrifices made by his parents.
- Encourage Gratitude: It may be beneficial for the mother to gently remind her son of the advantages of the options presented. She could ask him to consider the reliability of the Ford Edge and the financial relief it offers, fostering a sense of gratitude for what is being provided.
- Explore Alternatives Together: If the son is dissatisfied with the current options, the mother could invite him to brainstorm alternatives together. This collaborative approach can empower him and make him feel more involved in the decision-making process, potentially leading to a solution that satisfies both parties.
- Consider the Sister’s Needs: If the mother decides to offer the vehicle to the sister, she should communicate this decision to her son clearly. It’s important to explain that the sister appreciates the offer and that the decision is based on the son’s reactions. This can help the son understand the consequences of his behavior.
- Set Boundaries: If the son continues to express dissatisfaction, the mother may need to establish boundaries regarding future assistance. She can explain that while she wants to help, she also expects appreciation and respect for the support provided. This can help set a precedent for future interactions.
Ultimately, resolving this conflict requires empathy and understanding from both sides. By fostering open communication and setting clear expectations, the family can work towards a resolution that strengthens their relationships rather than creating further tension.
Join the Discussion
Image credit: Pixabay (This is example image – Not the actual photo)
What do you think? Would you have handled this differently?
Share your thoughts below! Vote: Do you agree with Reddit’s verdict?